Condonation guide delay labour sa of

LAW FOR ALL Apex court condon the 10 years delay in

Unreasonable delay in reviewing an award GilesFiles

sa labour guide condonation of delay

REPORTABLE IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH SA Labour. Should the employee be out of time, s/he may still refer the dispute, but s/he will have to make an application for condonation confirming the reasons for his/her delay. An employee may choose to claim: For the employer to reinstate him/her on the same terms and …, Part 4: Disputes to be referred to the Labour Court after conciliation at . In a condonation application the employee must motivate the reasons why the council should condone the late referral. The condonation application must address the length of the delay the reason for the delay, any prejudice both DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCEDURE.

LAW FOR ALL Apex court condon the 10 years delay in

UNFAIR LABOUR PRACTICE SA Federation For Mental Health. Delaying the prosecution of a review application can carry the risk of a court refusing to hear the application. InMacsteel Trading Wadeville v Francois van der Merwe and others, the Labour Appeal Court (“LAC”) had to decide whether the Labour Court erred in:. failing to deal with an undue delay in prosecuting a review application, simply because no application in terms of rule 11 of the, 1.4 It follows that decisions such as Cairn Executors v Gairn 1912 A 181 at 186 and even Smith NO v Brunmer NO and Another, quoted in the Civil Practice of the Supreme Court of South Africa, 4 th ed at p555 and relied on by the Court a quo and counsel, do not afford a complete answer and formula when the Rules 15.2 and 16 of the Labour Court.

Apex court condon the 10 years delay in filing ..= In our opinion, in view of the facts narrated by us, the High Court has erred in rejecting the Letters Patent Appeal on the ground of delay and latches on the part of the appellant in approaching the court nearly after 10 years of passing the impugned order. Delaying the prosecution of a review application can carry the risk of a court refusing to hear the application. InMacsteel Trading Wadeville v Francois van der Merwe and others, the Labour Appeal Court (“LAC”) had to decide whether the Labour Court erred in:. failing to deal with an undue delay in prosecuting a review application, simply because no application in terms of rule 11 of the

Delaying the prosecution of a review application can carry the risk of a court refusing to hear the application. InMacsteel Trading Wadeville v Francois van der Merwe and others, the Labour Appeal Court (“LAC”) had to decide whether the Labour Court erred in:. failing to deal with an undue delay in prosecuting a review application, simply because no application in terms of rule 11 of the Apex court condon the 10 years delay in filing ..= In our opinion, in view of the facts narrated by us, the High Court has erred in rejecting the Letters Patent Appeal on the ground of delay and latches on the part of the appellant in approaching the court nearly after 10 years of passing the impugned order.

Apex court condon the 10 years delay in filing ..= In our opinion, in view of the facts narrated by us, the High Court has erred in rejecting the Letters Patent Appeal on the ground of delay and latches on the part of the appellant in approaching the court nearly after 10 years of passing the impugned order. dispute to the Labour Court on the 3rd February 2009 the applicant was some 6 (six) months late. The principles relating to condonation [8] The principles governing an approach to be adopted when considering whether or not to grant condonation for the late filing of a matter in this Court, can be

After the Minister had raised the points in limine the applicant filed an application for condonation for non-compliance with these provisions and, although not directly stated, also seeking condonation for his failure to comply with section 145(5) of the Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 (“LRA”), which placed an obligation on him to apply NAVIGATION *Unfortunately, the product’s efficient navigation system with the index to the left of screen cannot be contained in this preview. Just use the scroll mechanism to the right and make sure you see the incredible depth of this publication by perusing the Index at p. 3. UPDATE TO OCTOBER 2014 Index - Keyword headings

Should the employee be out of time, s/he may still refer the dispute, but s/he will have to make an application for condonation confirming the reasons for his/her delay. An employee may choose to claim: For the employer to reinstate him/her on the same terms and … More labour policy review underway to modernise SA’s labour market Terminating fixed-term contracts a headache When is dismissal fair? Hearsay evidence can render dismissals unfair Summary BCEA Dereliction of duty charges must be proven Wholesale and Retail Sector for the Period 1 February 2012 until 30 January 2013

That is a considerable delay in the circumstances. It has been held, repeatedly, that if a party fails to seek condonation “as soon as possible, he should give an acceptable explanation, not only for the delay in making the application for the rescission of the default judgment, but also for the delay in … 1.4 It follows that decisions such as Cairn Executors v Gairn 1912 A 181 at 186 and even Smith NO v Brunmer NO and Another, quoted in the Civil Practice of the Supreme Court of South Africa, 4 th ed at p555 and relied on by the Court a quo and counsel, do not afford a complete answer and formula when the Rules 15.2 and 16 of the Labour Court

3/23/2015 · Flynote: The applicant brought an application for condonation of the late filing of a plea and counterclaim. The court considered the requirements for success in such applications and held that an applicant must explain the delay on affidavit and also show that they have a bona fide defence to such claim. The court held that the delay of three Should the employee be out of time, s/he may still refer the dispute, but s/he will have to make an application for condonation confirming the reasons for his/her delay. An employee may choose to claim: For the employer to reinstate him/her on the same terms and …

Objections What is it? If you are aggrieved by an assessment issued by SARS, you have the right to object to such an assessment. You do not have the right to object to a self-assessment (like Value-Added Tax (VAT) and Pay-As-You-Earn (PAYE), where no assessment has been raised by SARS. OTP had filed a suit on November 21, 2015, pursuant to which SA & Ors were served with a notice on November 27, 2015. The outer limit of 120 days to file the WS expired on March 26, 2016. Thereafter, SA & Ors filed its WS on May 7, 2016. The present application was filed by SA & Ors seeking condonation of delay in filing of WS. SECOND CASE

More labour policy review underway to modernise SA’s labour market Terminating fixed-term contracts a headache When is dismissal fair? Hearsay evidence can render dismissals unfair Summary BCEA Dereliction of duty charges must be proven Wholesale and Retail Sector for the Period 1 February 2012 until 30 January 2013 reasonable and acceptable explanation for the delay, the prospects of success are immaterial, and without prospects of success, no matter how good the explanation for the delay, an application for condonation should be refused. (cf. F Chetty v Law Society, Transvaal 1985 (2) 756 (A) at 765 (A-C); 1 1962 (4) SA 531 (A) at 537C-F.

Unreasonable delay in reviewing an award GilesFiles

sa labour guide condonation of delay

Unreasonable delay in reviewing an award GilesFiles. unfair labour practice if the employee is on suspension for an unreasonably long period and where there is no plausible reason for the delay in finalising the enquiry. An example of unfair suspension would be where an employee and her supervisor argue and the employer suspends only the employee, even though it was the supervisor who was to blame., Part 4: Disputes to be referred to the Labour Court after conciliation at . In a condonation application the employee must motivate the reasons why the council should condone the late referral. The condonation application must address the length of the delay the reason for the delay, any prejudice both DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCEDURE.

Unreasonable delay in reviewing an award GilesFiles. Conciliation: A Comprehensive Guide. By Nicolene Erasmus How to refer a dispute to the CCMA Unless the Act stipulates otherwise, any party to a dispute may refer the matter for conciliation [1].. The referral is effected as follows [2]: (1) A party must refer a dispute to the Commission for conciliation by delivering a completed LRA Form 7.11 (‘the referral document’)., Should the employee be out of time, s/he may still refer the dispute, but s/he will have to make an application for condonation confirming the reasons for his/her delay. An employee may choose to claim: For the employer to reinstate him/her on the same terms and ….

The reform of the costs regime in South Africa Part 2

sa labour guide condonation of delay

I filed with the labour court an application for Condonation…. Labour Relations Act No 66 of 1995 (hereinafter the “LRA”). However, the Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration (hereinafter the “CCMA”) is an organ of state and therefore bound by the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa No 108 of 1996 (hereinafter the “1996 Constitution”). Therefore, the issuing of https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Communism/Archive_12 Case Law in South Africa See below for summaries of, and links to, selected court decisions on labour disputes involving discrimination and on several Constitutional Court decisions that ….

sa labour guide condonation of delay

  • S v S (I 2985 /2013) [2015] NAHCMD 93 (22 April 2015
  • NAVIGATION Kidd's Law Publications

  • The sole issue that falls for determination is whether 1 st applicant has established the requirements for an application for condonation. The broad principles that guide the court in an application for condonation were set out in the case of United Plant Hire (Pty) Ltd v Hills & Ors 1976 (1) SA … While the subject matter of applications for leave to appeal and the historical background thereto were dealt with extensively by Steph E van der Merwe in 1982 (Jan) DR 14, this article seeks to outline the practical aspects that attorneys must keep in mind when making applications for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA).

    2/13/2014 · Unreasonable delay in reviewing an award. Posted by GilesFiles Feb 13, LAC Summary: Delay in prosecuting review application- principles restated- unreasonableness of the delay and unsatisfactory explanation. Appeal dismissed with costs. Not cited in Du Toit et al Labour Relations Law: A comprehensive guide 6th edn (2015) Leave a reply 1The test for condonation was set out in the authority of Melane v Santam Insurance Co Ltd 1962 (4) SA 531 (A) at 532 C-F. The decision in NUM v Council for Mineral Technology [1999] 3 BLLR 209 (LAC) is also instructive, as is the summary of the applicable legal principle set out in paragraphs 24 to 29 in Gaoshubelwe and Others v Pie Man’s Pantry (Pty) Limited (2009) 30 ILJ 347 (LC).

    After the Minister had raised the points in limine the applicant filed an application for condonation for non-compliance with these provisions and, although not directly stated, also seeking condonation for his failure to comply with section 145(5) of the Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 (“LRA”), which placed an obligation on him to apply The CCMA's statutory functions, as set out in the Labour Relations Act, 66 of 1995 (LRA), are divided into those which are compulsory and those which are discretionary. The CCMA's compulsory statutory functions are to: conciliate workplace disputes; arbitrate certain categories of disputes that remain unresolved after conciliation;

    Part 4: Disputes to be referred to the Labour Court after conciliation at . In a condonation application the employee must motivate the reasons why the council should condone the late referral. The condonation application must address the length of the delay the reason for the delay, any prejudice both DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCEDURE “Determining Jurisdiction” CCMA or Bargaining Council? By Johann Scheepers [Joy Global Africa (Pty) Ltd v Commission for Conciliation Mediation and Arbitration and Others (JA 119/13) [2015] ZALAC 1 (15 January 2015)] – SA Labour Appeal Court Judgment] Joy Global Africa (Pty) Ltd v Commission for Conciliation Mediation and Arbitration and

    While the subject matter of applications for leave to appeal and the historical background thereto were dealt with extensively by Steph E van der Merwe in 1982 (Jan) DR 14, this article seeks to outline the practical aspects that attorneys must keep in mind when making applications for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA). 2/7/2019 · (a) the delay was an unexplained and unjustified departure from her employer’s internal disciplinary procedure and therefore unlawful, and (b) the delay was not consonant with the Labour Relations Act (LRA). [35] The applicant highlighted that her employment and dismissal were regulated by …

    3/23/2015В В· Flynote: The applicant brought an application for condonation of the late filing of a plea and counterclaim. The court considered the requirements for success in such applications and held that an applicant must explain the delay on affidavit and also show that they have a bona fide defence to such claim. The court held that the delay of three dispute to the Labour Court on the 3rd February 2009 the applicant was some 6 (six) months late. The principles relating to condonation [8] The principles governing an approach to be adopted when considering whether or not to grant condonation for the late filing of a matter in this Court, can be

    The CCMA's statutory functions, as set out in the Labour Relations Act, 66 of 1995 (LRA), are divided into those which are compulsory and those which are discretionary. The CCMA's compulsory statutory functions are to: conciliate workplace disputes; arbitrate certain categories of disputes that remain unresolved after conciliation; Should the employee be out of time, s/he may still refer the dispute, but s/he will have to make an application for condonation confirming the reasons for his/her delay. An employee may choose to claim: For the employer to reinstate him/her on the same terms and …

    1.4 It follows that decisions such as Cairn Executors v Gairn 1912 A 181 at 186 and even Smith NO v Brunmer NO and Another, quoted in the Civil Practice of the Supreme Court of South Africa, 4 th ed at p555 and relied on by the Court a quo and counsel, do not afford a complete answer and formula when the Rules 15.2 and 16 of the Labour Court „The test for determining if condonation should be granted is whether it is in the interest of justice. Factors relevant to this inquiry including but are not limited to the extent and cause of the delay; the prejudice to other litigants, the reasonableness of the explanation for the delay, the significance of the

    Objections What is it? If you are aggrieved by an assessment issued by SARS, you have the right to object to such an assessment. You do not have the right to object to a self-assessment (like Value-Added Tax (VAT) and Pay-As-You-Earn (PAYE), where no assessment has been raised by SARS. Part 4: Disputes to be referred to the Labour Court after conciliation at . In a condonation application the employee must motivate the reasons why the council should condone the late referral. The condonation application must address the length of the delay the reason for the delay, any prejudice both DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCEDURE

    Conciliation: A Comprehensive Guide. By Nicolene Erasmus How to refer a dispute to the CCMA Unless the Act stipulates otherwise, any party to a dispute may refer the matter for conciliation [1].. The referral is effected as follows [2]: (1) A party must refer a dispute to the Commission for conciliation by delivering a completed LRA Form 7.11 (‘the referral document’). 1The test for condonation was set out in the authority of Melane v Santam Insurance Co Ltd 1962 (4) SA 531 (A) at 532 C-F. The decision in NUM v Council for Mineral Technology [1999] 3 BLLR 209 (LAC) is also instructive, as is the summary of the applicable legal principle set out in paragraphs 24 to 29 in Gaoshubelwe and Others v Pie Man’s Pantry (Pty) Limited (2009) 30 ILJ 347 (LC).

    That is a considerable delay in the circumstances. It has been held, repeatedly, that if a party fails to seek condonation “as soon as possible, he should give an acceptable explanation, not only for the delay in making the application for the rescission of the default judgment, but also for the delay in … NAVIGATION *Unfortunately, the product’s efficient navigation system with the index to the left of screen cannot be contained in this preview. Just use the scroll mechanism to the right and make sure you see the incredible depth of this publication by perusing the Index at p. 3. UPDATE TO OCTOBER 2014 Index - Keyword headings

    I filed with the labour court an application for Condonation…. 7/5/2016в в· 509 per cent rise in cases under child labour law: study; the central information commission has allowed disclosure of file notings on the mercy petition of a rape and murder convict, rejecting the government's contention that the records cannot be disclosed as these are privileged documents under article 74(2) of the constitution., 2/13/2014в в· unreasonable delay in reviewing an award. posted by gilesfiles feb 13, lac summary: delay in prosecuting review application- principles restated- unreasonableness of the delay and unsatisfactory explanation. appeal dismissed with costs. not cited in du toit et al labour relations law: a comprehensive guide 6th edn (2015) leave a reply).

    More labour policy review underway to modernise SA’s labour market Terminating fixed-term contracts a headache When is dismissal fair? Hearsay evidence can render dismissals unfair Summary BCEA Dereliction of duty charges must be proven Wholesale and Retail Sector for the Period 1 February 2012 until 30 January 2013 “Determining Jurisdiction” CCMA or Bargaining Council? By Johann Scheepers [Joy Global Africa (Pty) Ltd v Commission for Conciliation Mediation and Arbitration and Others (JA 119/13) [2015] ZALAC 1 (15 January 2015)] – SA Labour Appeal Court Judgment] Joy Global Africa (Pty) Ltd v Commission for Conciliation Mediation and Arbitration and

    dispute to the Labour Court on the 3rd February 2009 the applicant was some 6 (six) months late. The principles relating to condonation [8] The principles governing an approach to be adopted when considering whether or not to grant condonation for the late filing of a matter in this Court, can be Objection declined -- Reason - Submit Letter of Condonation and Reasons for being late. Call Centre cant help - go to Randburg SARS -- they tell me the "scratch pad" says reason for delay is "not substantial enough" to approve the submission of the Logbook and to give the tax payer a refund.

    1.4 It follows that decisions such as Cairn Executors v Gairn 1912 A 181 at 186 and even Smith NO v Brunmer NO and Another, quoted in the Civil Practice of the Supreme Court of South Africa, 4 th ed at p555 and relied on by the Court a quo and counsel, do not afford a complete answer and formula when the Rules 15.2 and 16 of the Labour Court OTP had filed a suit on November 21, 2015, pursuant to which SA & Ors were served with a notice on November 27, 2015. The outer limit of 120 days to file the WS expired on March 26, 2016. Thereafter, SA & Ors filed its WS on May 7, 2016. The present application was filed by SA & Ors seeking condonation of delay in filing of WS. SECOND CASE

    1.4 It follows that decisions such as Cairn Executors v Gairn 1912 A 181 at 186 and even Smith NO v Brunmer NO and Another, quoted in the Civil Practice of the Supreme Court of South Africa, 4 th ed at p555 and relied on by the Court a quo and counsel, do not afford a complete answer and formula when the Rules 15.2 and 16 of the Labour Court IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA With regard to the condonation application, the first respondent was of the view that the the application for condonation should fail because of the inordinate delay occasioned solely by the applicant’s tardiness in referring the

    OTP had filed a suit on November 21, 2015, pursuant to which SA & Ors were served with a notice on November 27, 2015. The outer limit of 120 days to file the WS expired on March 26, 2016. Thereafter, SA & Ors filed its WS on May 7, 2016. The present application was filed by SA & Ors seeking condonation of delay in filing of WS. SECOND CASE 2/13/2014В В· Unreasonable delay in reviewing an award. Posted by GilesFiles Feb 13, LAC Summary: Delay in prosecuting review application- principles restated- unreasonableness of the delay and unsatisfactory explanation. Appeal dismissed with costs. Not cited in Du Toit et al Labour Relations Law: A comprehensive guide 6th edn (2015) Leave a reply

    1The test for condonation was set out in the authority of Melane v Santam Insurance Co Ltd 1962 (4) SA 531 (A) at 532 C-F. The decision in NUM v Council for Mineral Technology [1999] 3 BLLR 209 (LAC) is also instructive, as is the summary of the applicable legal principle set out in paragraphs 24 to 29 in Gaoshubelwe and Others v Pie Man’s Pantry (Pty) Limited (2009) 30 ILJ 347 (LC). While the subject matter of applications for leave to appeal and the historical background thereto were dealt with extensively by Steph E van der Merwe in 1982 (Jan) DR 14, this article seeks to outline the practical aspects that attorneys must keep in mind when making applications for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA).

    condonation of delay application Ask for RTI Support

    NAVIGATION Kidd's Law Publications. otp had filed a suit on november 21, 2015, pursuant to which sa & ors were served with a notice on november 27, 2015. the outer limit of 120 days to file the ws expired on march 26, 2016. thereafter, sa & ors filed its ws on may 7, 2016. the present application was filed by sa & ors seeking condonation of delay in filing of ws. second case, for a delay of eight months in filing the condonation application is the following: вђ•after the late filing of the statement of claim council undertook to draft the application for condonation but due to work pressure was not able to do so. eventually during october вђ¦); for a delay of eight months in filing the condonation application is the following: вђ•after the late filing of the statement of claim council undertook to draft the application for condonation but due to work pressure was not able to do so. eventually during october вђ¦, more labour policy review underway to modernise saвђ™s labour market terminating fixed-term contracts a headache when is dismissal fair? hearsay evidence can render dismissals unfair summary bcea dereliction of duty charges must be proven wholesale and retail sector for the period 1 february 2012 until 30 january 2013.

    UNFAIR LABOUR PRACTICE SA Federation For Mental Health

    S v S (I 2985 /2013) [2015] NAHCMD 93 (22 April 2015. while the subject matter of applications for leave to appeal and the historical background thereto were dealt with extensively by steph e van der merwe in 1982 (jan) dr 14, this article seeks to outline the practical aspects that attorneys must keep in mind when making applications for leave to appeal to the supreme court of appeal (sca)., the sole issue that falls for determination is whether 1 st applicant has established the requirements for an application for condonation. the broad principles that guide the court in an application for condonation were set out in the case of united plant hire (pty) ltd v hills & ors 1976 (1) sa вђ¦).

    Limitation Act 1963 s.5 - Condonation of delay - Appeal

    Condonation SA Labour Guide. after the minister had raised the points in limine the applicant filed an application for condonation for non-compliance with these provisions and, although not directly stated, also seeking condonation for his failure to comply with section 145(5) of the labour relations act 66 of 1995 (вђњlraвђќ), which placed an obligation on him to apply, 3/23/2015в в· flynote: the applicant brought an application for condonation of the late filing of a plea and counterclaim. the court considered the requirements for success in such applications and held that an applicant must explain the delay on affidavit and also show that they have a bona fide defence to such claim. the court held that the delay of three).

    Condonation SA Labour Guide

    REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA L SAFLII. for a delay of eight months in filing the condonation application is the following: вђ•after the late filing of the statement of claim council undertook to draft the application for condonation but due to work pressure was not able to do so. eventually during october вђ¦, part 4: disputes to be referred to the labour court after conciliation at . in a condonation application the employee must motivate the reasons why the council should condone the late referral. the condonation application must address the length of the delay the reason for the delay, any prejudice both dispute resolution procedure).

    REPORTABLE IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH SA Labour

    NishithDesai. apex court condon the 10 years delay in filing ..= in our opinion, in view of the facts narrated by us, the high court has erred in rejecting the letters patent appeal on the ground of delay and latches on the part of the appellant in approaching the court nearly after 10 years of passing the impugned order., unfair labour practice if the employee is on suspension for an unreasonably long period and where there is no plausible reason for the delay in finalising the enquiry. an example of unfair suspension would be where an employee and her supervisor argue and the employer suspends only the employee, even though it was the supervisor who was to blame.).

    WSG Article Undue Delay in Prosecuting Review

    Limitation Act 1963 s.5 - Condonation of delay - Appeal. that is a considerable delay in the circumstances. it has been held, repeatedly, that if a party fails to seek condonation вђњas soon as possible, he should give an acceptable explanation, not only for the delay in making the application for the rescission of the default judgment, but also for the delay in вђ¦, otp had filed a suit on november 21, 2015, pursuant to which sa & ors were served with a notice on november 27, 2015. the outer limit of 120 days to file the ws expired on march 26, 2016. thereafter, sa & ors filed its ws on may 7, 2016. the present application was filed by sa & ors seeking condonation of delay in filing of ws. second case).

    GUIDELINES TO FOLLOW WHEN CONSIDERING THE MERITS OF AN APPEAL IN A CASE OF MISCONDUCT 2001. TABLE OF CONTENTS Schedule 8 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995, insofar as it relates to discipline constitutes a part of the Disciplinary Code and Procedures for the Public Service. It is therefore, evident that these guidelines While the subject matter of applications for leave to appeal and the historical background thereto were dealt with extensively by Steph E van der Merwe in 1982 (Jan) DR 14, this article seeks to outline the practical aspects that attorneys must keep in mind when making applications for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA).

    Part 4: Disputes to be referred to the Labour Court after conciliation at . In a condonation application the employee must motivate the reasons why the council should condone the late referral. The condonation application must address the length of the delay the reason for the delay, any prejudice both DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCEDURE 3/23/2015В В· Flynote: The applicant brought an application for condonation of the late filing of a plea and counterclaim. The court considered the requirements for success in such applications and held that an applicant must explain the delay on affidavit and also show that they have a bona fide defence to such claim. The court held that the delay of three

    1The test for condonation was set out in the authority of Melane v Santam Insurance Co Ltd 1962 (4) SA 531 (A) at 532 C-F. The decision in NUM v Council for Mineral Technology [1999] 3 BLLR 209 (LAC) is also instructive, as is the summary of the applicable legal principle set out in paragraphs 24 to 29 in Gaoshubelwe and Others v Pie Man’s Pantry (Pty) Limited (2009) 30 ILJ 347 (LC). Limitation Act, 1963 - s.5 - Condonation of delay - Appeal by Government Corporation against judgment and decree in civil suit - Also application under for condonation of delay of 4 years - Allowed by Division Bench - Justification of - Held: Not justified - Law Department of the Government Corporation did not approach High Court with clean

    The sole issue that falls for determination is whether 1 st applicant has established the requirements for an application for condonation. The broad principles that guide the court in an application for condonation were set out in the case of United Plant Hire (Pty) Ltd v Hills & Ors 1976 (1) SA … 7/5/2016 · 509 per cent rise in cases under child labour law: Study; The Central Information Commission has allowed disclosure of file notings on the mercy petition of a rape and murder convict, rejecting the government's contention that the records cannot be disclosed as these are privileged documents under Article 74(2) of the Constitution.

    Apex court condon the 10 years delay in filing ..= In our opinion, in view of the facts narrated by us, the High Court has erred in rejecting the Letters Patent Appeal on the ground of delay and latches on the part of the appellant in approaching the court nearly after 10 years of passing the impugned order. That is a considerable delay in the circumstances. It has been held, repeatedly, that if a party fails to seek condonation “as soon as possible, he should give an acceptable explanation, not only for the delay in making the application for the rescission of the default judgment, but also for the delay in …

    That is a considerable delay in the circumstances. It has been held, repeatedly, that if a party fails to seek condonation “as soon as possible, he should give an acceptable explanation, not only for the delay in making the application for the rescission of the default judgment, but also for the delay in … „The test for determining if condonation should be granted is whether it is in the interest of justice. Factors relevant to this inquiry including but are not limited to the extent and cause of the delay; the prejudice to other litigants, the reasonableness of the explanation for the delay, the significance of the

    Objections What is it? If you are aggrieved by an assessment issued by SARS, you have the right to object to such an assessment. You do not have the right to object to a self-assessment (like Value-Added Tax (VAT) and Pay-As-You-Earn (PAYE), where no assessment has been raised by SARS. Part 4: Disputes to be referred to the Labour Court after conciliation at . In a condonation application the employee must motivate the reasons why the council should condone the late referral. The condonation application must address the length of the delay the reason for the delay, any prejudice both DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCEDURE

    ‘In explaining the reason for the delay it is necessary for the party seeking condonation to fully explain the reason for the delay in order for the court to be in a proper position to assess whether or not the explanation is a good one. This was in my view requires an explanation which covers the … Labour Relations Act No 66 of 1995 (hereinafter the “LRA”). However, the Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration (hereinafter the “CCMA”) is an organ of state and therefore bound by the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa No 108 of 1996 (hereinafter the “1996 Constitution”). Therefore, the issuing of

    NishithDesai